Under the hood
Plain-English answers to the most common questions about the model, the math, and what the report does — and doesn't — tell you.
Common questions
If you have a question that isn't here, reach out — we're happy to answer.
What does "probability of success" actually mean?
The model runs your retirement plan through 500 or 1,000 different market scenarios — some with strong markets, some with poor markets, and everything in between. The probability of success is simply the percentage of those scenarios where your money didn't run out before the end of your planning horizon. A 75% probability means your plan survived in 75 out of 100 simulated market environments. It is not a guarantee of any outcome — it is a measure of how much cushion your plan has against market uncertainty.
What is a Monte Carlo simulation?
Monte Carlo simulation is a technique used widely in financial planning, engineering, and science. Instead of projecting one "average" outcome, it runs hundreds or thousands of randomized scenarios and shows the range of possible results. In retirement planning, this means testing your plan against many different sequences of market returns — not just a smooth average. The name comes from the Monte Carlo casino in Monaco, a reference to the randomness involved. It's the industry standard approach for retirement analysis because it captures the real risk of bad market timing in a way that simple average-return projections cannot.
Why does my plan show slightly different results if I run it twice?
Each run draws a fresh set of randomized market scenarios. Because the scenarios are random, two runs with identical inputs will produce results that are very close but not exactly identical — typically within one or two percentage points on the success rate. This is normal and expected. If you run the same inputs multiple times and consistently see 72–74%, that range is your answer. A single run is reliable; the small variation between runs is just statistical noise.
What is a "Roth conversion" and should I do one?
A Roth conversion means paying income tax now on money sitting in a traditional IRA or 401(k), then moving it to a Roth account where future growth is tax-free. The appeal: if you expect to be in a higher tax bracket later (due to required withdrawals, Social Security, or a surviving spouse filing single), converting some money now at a lower rate can reduce your total lifetime tax bill. The report models whether a conversion schedule makes mathematical sense for your situation. It is a starting point, not a recommendation — always confirm a specific conversion plan with a tax professional, since individual circumstances (Medicare premiums, state taxes, estate planning) can significantly change the picture.
Why do the income bars sometimes go above my spending goal?
After age 73 or 75 (depending on your birth year), the IRS requires you to withdraw a minimum amount from traditional IRA and 401(k) accounts each year — these are called Required Minimum Distributions, or RMDs. The amount is calculated as a percentage of your account balance, not based on what you need to spend. In years when your RMD exceeds your lifestyle spending, the bars in the chart will extend above your spending goal line. The extra cash doesn't disappear — the model moves it to your taxable accounts — but it does mean you'll owe income tax on the full RMD amount regardless of how much you actually spend.
What does "today's dollars" mean throughout the report?
Inflation makes future dollars worth less than current dollars. A dollar in 20 years buys less than a dollar today. To make the numbers easier to read, all amounts in the report — account balances, income, spending — are shown in today's purchasing power rather than the raw future dollar amount. So if the report shows your portfolio at $2 million at age 85, that means your portfolio would have the same buying power as $2 million does right now. The simulation does account for inflation internally; it's just removed from the displayed numbers so you can compare values across different ages without mentally adjusting for price increases.
What is a "draw rate" and why does it matter?
The draw rate controls how aggressively the model pulls money from your traditional IRA or 401(k) accounts each year before you hit required minimum distributions. A lower draw rate leaves more in the account to grow but may mean pulling more from taxable accounts or Roth. A higher draw rate pulls more from pre-tax accounts now, which can reduce future RMD pressure — but at the cost of higher taxes today. The Full Analysis automatically tests several draw rates and shows you which produces the best outcome for your specific situation.
Is this the same as working with a financial advisor?
No — and that's intentional. This is a one-time analysis with no ongoing relationship, no assets under management, and no product to sell you. Traditional advisors often earn fees based on the assets they manage, which creates an incentive to keep you engaged. This report is designed to give you an honest picture of where you stand, identify your biggest levers, and help you have a more informed conversation if you do work with an advisor. Think of it as a second opinion or a starting point — not a replacement for personalized professional advice on complex situations.
How accurate is this analysis?
The analysis is as accurate as the inputs you provide and the assumptions built into the model. Return assumptions are drawn from institutional capital market forecasts (Vanguard, BlackRock, Fidelity) using historical market data back to 1995. Tax calculations model federal brackets, capital gains stacking, Social Security provisional-income rules, RMDs, Medicare surcharges, and state income tax. That said, this is a model — it cannot account for events that fall outside the range of historical markets, major tax law changes, healthcare emergencies, divorce, or other life disruptions. Use it as a rigorous starting point, not a guarantee.
Key concepts
Plain-English explanations of the ideas behind the analysis.
Market scenarios (simulated paths)
Each "path" is one complete simulation of your retirement from start to finish under a randomized sequence of market returns. Running 500 or 1,000 of these paths shows the full range of possible outcomes — not just the average. Your success rate is the share of paths that didn't run out of money.
Market regimes (bull / bear / recovery)
Real markets don't deliver the same return every year — they tend to run in streaks. The model uses a three-state system: bull (above-average returns), bear (below-average or negative), and recovery. Each year, the simulation transitions between these states based on historical probabilities, capturing the real-world clustering of good and bad years.
Withdrawal order (Roth last)
When you need cash in retirement, the order in which you draw from different accounts affects your lifetime tax bill. The default strategy — "Roth last" — uses taxable accounts and traditional IRA/401(k) first, preserving Roth accounts to compound tax-free as long as possible. This is generally the most tax-efficient approach for most retirees.
Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs)
The IRS requires you to start withdrawing a minimum amount from traditional retirement accounts beginning at age 73 or 75, depending on when you were born. These withdrawals are calculated as a percentage of your account balance and are fully taxable. The model follows current IRS rules (SECURE 2.0) and accounts for RMDs in every simulation year.
Tax bracket filling
Rather than withdrawing only what you need to spend, some strategies deliberately pull a bit more from traditional accounts to "fill up" a low tax bracket — converting future higher-tax withdrawals into current lower-tax ones. The report tests several bracket strategies and shows which one minimizes your total lifetime tax for your specific income level.
Flexible spending in weak markets
One of the most powerful tools for improving retirement odds is the willingness to spend slightly less in bad market years. The model includes an optional flexible spending rule: if markets have been weak for several years, spending scales down to 80% of your target. When markets recover, full spending resumes. This small adjustment can meaningfully improve long-term sustainability without requiring a major lifestyle change.
Social Security provisional income
Social Security benefits aren't always tax-free. If your combined income (wages, withdrawals, half your SS benefit) exceeds certain thresholds, up to 85% of your benefit becomes taxable. The model applies these IRS rules each year, which is why Social Security timing can affect your plan more than many people expect — and why delaying benefits sometimes improves your tax picture as well as your monthly income.
Medicare IRMAA surcharges
If your income in a given year exceeds certain thresholds, Medicare charges higher premiums for Part B and Part D coverage — these are called IRMAA surcharges. The model applies current IRMAA tiers to projected income each year. This is particularly relevant during years when Roth conversions, large RMDs, or asset sales spike your income — and is one reason why a seemingly beneficial conversion can have hidden costs.
The model
The assumptions and data sources the simulation is built on. Designed to be transparent — so you can evaluate whether the model is right for your situation.
| Component | Approach |
|---|---|
| Simulation engine | Markov three-state regime model (bull / bear / recovery) with persistence controls. Each year transitions between states based on historical probabilities, capped to prevent unrealistically long streaks. |
| Equity return assumptions | Drawn from institutional capital market assumptions (Vanguard, BlackRock, Fidelity presets available). Total return basis — dividends included. |
| Historical calibration | S&P 500 annual returns, 1995–2024 (FRED data series). Used to calibrate regime transition probabilities and return distributions. |
| Bond returns | Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index (intermediate-duration aggregate) as the bond proxy. |
| Inflation | CPI-U (all urban consumers, FRED series CPIAUCSL). Note: the model uses CPI-U, not CPI-E (the elderly-specific index), which may slightly understate inflation for retirees with above-average healthcare spending. |
| Equity allocation | Glides from a higher equity allocation pre-retirement to a lower allocation in retirement over a configurable transition period. |
| Component | Approach |
|---|---|
| Federal income tax | Current IRS brackets (married filing jointly assumption). Standard deduction applied. Brackets are not adjusted for future inflation in the model — a conservative assumption. |
| Long-term capital gains | 0% / 15% / 20% brackets, stacked on top of ordinary income per IRC §1(h). |
| Net Investment Income Tax | 3.8% federal surtax on investment income above the MAGI threshold (not inflation-indexed). |
| Social Security taxation | Provisional income rules per IRC §86. Up to 85% of benefits taxable above income thresholds. Thresholds are not inflation-indexed — meaning more of your benefit becomes taxable over time in real terms. |
| State income tax | Modeled as a flat rate approximation for the selected state. Progressive states use an estimated effective rate at typical retirement income levels. A move to another state requires re-running the analysis. |
| Medicare IRMAA | Current CMS Part B/D surcharge tiers applied to projected income each year. Uses a simplified current-year income proxy rather than the actual two-year look-back. |
| Component | Approach |
|---|---|
| Required Minimum Distributions | IRS Uniform Lifetime Table (post-SECURE 2.0). RMD start age follows SECURE 2.0 rules: age 73 for those born 1951–1959, age 75 for those born 1960 or later. |
| Withdrawal sequencing | Configurable. Default: Roth last (taxable accounts and traditional first, Roth preserved). Adjusted in bear years and when cash buffer falls below target. |
| Cash buffer | Model maintains a target cash buffer (a multiple of annual spending) to avoid forced selling in down markets. Buffer is rebuilt in normal market years. |
| Roth conversions | Optional grid search finds the conversion schedule that minimizes lifetime tax on the median-path scenario. Results are illustrative — confirm with a tax professional. |
| Social Security | Entered as the expected annual benefit at your claimed age. Early and delayed claiming factors follow SSA rules. Spousal and survivor benefits are not separately modeled. |
| Working-years savings | While still earning salary: lifestyle spend is modeled at 90% of gross salary (household total when both spouses work). 10% is saved — typically 6% to traditional IRA/401(k) via salary deferral and the remainder to cash/brokerage via surplus parking. After the first spouse retires (couple) or the primary retires (single), your entered monthly retirement spend goal applies instead. |
These settings are the same for every report. They reflect industry-standard retirement planning practices and are not configurable by the client.
| Assumption | Value |
|---|---|
| Cash buffer | 1.5× annual lifestyle spend maintained in cash at all times. Rebuilt in normal market years; not force-rebuilt in bear years. Prevents forced selling of investments to meet short-term spending needs. |
| Withdrawal order | Roth last — taxable accounts (brokerage, cash) drawn first, then traditional IRA/401(k), then Roth. Preserves tax-free Roth balances to compound as long as possible. Adjusted in bear years and when cash falls below buffer target. |
| Filing status | Married filing jointly for couple plans; single filer for solo plans (when spouse is not included). Thresholds follow IRS brackets for the matching status. |
| Equity glide path | Equity allocation steps down from a higher pre-retirement percentage to a lower in-retirement percentage over a 5-year transition ending at the primary client's retirement age. Remainder held in bonds (aggregate-proxy returns). |
| Regime model | Markov three-state (bull / bear / recovery) with semi-Markov streak caps. Maximum consecutive bear years and bull years are capped based on empirical 1995–2024 S&P 500 data to prevent unrealistically long streaks. |
| Working-years savings | 90% of gross salary spent; 10% saved (6% traditional deferral + 4% to cash/brokerage). Couples: per-person while both working. After first retirement, the client's monthly spend goal applies. |
| Salary growth during working years | Salaries optionally grow with simulated inflation each year (COLA). An additional real wage growth rate (default 0%/yr, configurable up to 5%/yr in the Planner) compounds on top, useful for younger workers expecting career-curve income increases. BLS data suggests ~1% real long-run for most workers. |
| Flexible spending floor | In weak-market periods (trailing 3-year equity return below −3%), spending scales down to 80% of the lifestyle target. Full spending resumes when markets recover above 3%. This reflects a moderate, realistic reduction consistent with established dynamic withdrawal research. |
| Investment fee drag | A fee drag assumption (0.50% per year) is applied to portfolio returns each year, reflecting moderate fund and platform costs — typical of workplace 401(k) menus or target-date funds, not ultra-low-cost DIY indexing and not full-service advisory fees. Gross returns from the capital market assumptions are reduced accordingly. |
Know the limits
Every model has boundaries. Here's an honest accounting of what's outside the scope of this analysis — and what that means for how you use it.
Get a clear, honest picture of your retirement — no jargon, no sales pitch.
Get your report →For educational and illustrative purposes only — not financial, tax, or legal advice.